JTIE 2016, 8(2):134-150 | 10.5507/jtie.2016.013

THE DESIGN AND VERIFICATION OF PROBLEM TEACHING IN SECONDARY VOCATIONAL SCHOOL

Ľubomír ŽÁČOK, Milan BERNÁT
Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici, SR
Prešovská univerzita v Prešove, SR

The authors of scientific studies analyzing the problem teaching in the current school. In the second part of the study indicate a specific proposal process execution problem teaching in upper secondary education. The last part of a scientific study has an empirical character. This section describes the implementation of the pedagogical experiment. The study authors analyzed qualitative and quantitative data collected implemented within the pedagogical experiment. Using research methods, we found that applying problem teaching in the educational process is justified.

Keywords: problem teaching, pupil, pedagogical experiment, design, analysis, secondary vocational schools

Received: April 10, 2016; Accepted: May 27, 2016; Prepublished online: May 30, 2016; Published: October 27, 2016

Download citation

References

  1. Argalacs, M. (1984). Riešime problém od zadania po kontrolu výsledku. Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo, 72 s.
  2. Bajtoš, J. (2003). Teória a prax didaktiky Žilina: Žilinská univerzita, 384 s.
  3. Brightman, H. J. (2006). GSU Master Teaching. Program: On Critical Thinking [on - line]. [cit. 10. 01. 2013]. Dostupné na internete:http://www.wku.edu/university experience/essay5.html.
  4. Crowder, N.A. (1960) Automatic Teaching by Intrinsic Programming. In: Lumsdaine, A.A, Glaser, R (editors): Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning: A Source Book. Washington: National Education Association.
  5. Chajdiak, J., Rublíková, E., Gudába, M. (1994). Štatistické metódy v praxi. Bratislava: STATIS.
  6. Jurčová, M. (2003). Tvorivosť v každodennom živote a vo výskume. Bratislava: IRIS, 255 s.
  7. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. In: Educational Psychologist 41 (2), p. 75-86. Go to original source...
  8. Králiková, A. (2013). Nové prístupy vo vyučovaní odborného predmetu technológia v SOŠ, téma: Dámska sukňa (Diplomová práca). Banská Bystrica: FPV UMB.
  9. Niemierko, B.: (1979). Taxonómia celów wychowania. In: Kwartalnik pedagogyczny. roč. 24, č. 2, 58-69 s.
  10. Kyriacou, Ch. (1996). Klíčové dovednosti učitele. Praha: Portál, 152 s.
  11. Lerner, I. J. (1974). Prblemnoje obučenije. Moskva: Znanije. 214 s.
  12. Petlák, E. (2004). Všeobecná didaktika. Bratislava: Iris, 318 s.
  13. Okon, W. K. (1966). K základům problémového učení. Praha: SPN, 222 s.
  14. Petty, G. (1996). Moderní vyučování. Praha: Portál, 145 s.
  15. Singule, F. (1990). Americká pragmatická pedagogika. Praha: SPN, 197 s.
  16. Cимоненко, Cамородский, Тищенко. (2012). Технология. Технический труд. 7 класс. Учебник.
  17. Turek, I. (2008). Didaktika. Bratislava: Iura Edition., s. 595.
  18. Turek, I. (1995). Didaktické testy. Bratislava: MPC, 1995.