JTIE 2015, 7(1):7-34 | 10.5507/jtie.2015.001

INQUIRY-BASED INSTRUCTION AND TEACHER'S COMPETENCES FOR ITS REALIZATION

Jiří DOSTÁL
Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci

The article deals with a research of the teachers´ competences bounded to the realization of the inquiry-based instruction. It sees competences as a necessary part of the teacher´s abilities and advocates this topic into the other authors´ works' context. It provides an overview of the current state of the solved issue and presents the partial results of the realized researches which became the base for the realization of a broader investigation which is in the article presented. The aim of the research was to define (via appropriate approaches) which competences of a teacher are the key ones for the realization of the inquiry-based instruction, which are the basic ones and the threshold ones. This all became a base for a creation of a competence model.

Keywords: inquiry-based instruction, competence, teacher, education

Received: February 16, 2015; Accepted: May 25, 2015; Published: June 1, 2015

Download citation

Attachments:

Download fileTurkce

INQUIRY-BASED INSTRUCTION AND TEACHER'S COMPETENCES FOR ITS REALIZATION.pdf
File size: 761.34 kB

References

  1. Abels, S. (2014). Inquiry-Based Science Education and Special Needs - Teachers' Reflections on an Inclusive Setting. Journal of Education. roč. 2, č. 2, s. 124 - 154.
  2. Allake-Tuenter, E., H., Biemans J. A., Tobi, H., Wals, A. E. J., Oosterheert, I. & Mullder, M. (2012). Inquiry-Based Science Education Competencies of Primary School Teachers: A literature study and critical review of the American National Science Education Standards. International Journal of Science Education. roč. 34, č. 17, s. 2609-2640. Go to original source...
  3. Australian institute for teaching and school leadership. (2011). National Professional Standards for Teachers [online]. [cit. 2014-08-04]. Dostupné z: http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/aitsl_national_professional_standards_for_teachers
  4. Avraamidou, L. & Zembal-Saul, C. (2010). In search of well-started beginning science teachers: Insights from two first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. roč. 47, č. 6, s. 661 - 686. Go to original source...
  5. Bader, R. & Müller, M. (2002). Leitziel der Berufsbildu Handlungskompetenz. Die berufsbildende Schule. roč. 54, č. 6, s. 176 - 182.
  6. Belz, H. & Siegrist, M. (2001). Klíčové kompetence a jejich rozvíjení: východiska, metody, cvičení a hry. Praha: Portál.
  7. Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education. roč. 5, č. 1, s. 43 - 51. Go to original source...
  8. Colburn, A. (2000). An Inquiry Primer. Science Scope. Special issue. roč. 23, č. 6, s. 42 - 44.
  9. Commission on Teacher credentialing. (2009). California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) [online]. [cit. 2014-08-04]. Dostupné z: http://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/standards/CSTP-2009.pdf
  10. Cruickshank, D. R. & Haefele, D. (2001). Good Teachers, Plural. Educational Leadership. roč. 58, č. 5, s. 26 - 30.
  11. Day, Ch. (2012). Efektivní učitelé a jejich vášnivé zaujetí kvalitou. Orbis scholae. roč. 6, č. 3, s. 9 - 26.
  12. Dostál, J. (2015). Badatelsky orientovaná výuka: Pojetí, podstata, význam a přínosy. Olomouc. UP. Go to original source...
  13. Duncan, R. G., Pilitsis, V. & Piegaro, M. (2010). Development of Preservice Teachers' Ability to Critique and Adapt Inquiry-based Instructional Materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education. roč. 21, č. 1, s. 1 - 14. Go to original source...
  14. Důvody nezájmu žáků o přírodovědné a technické obory [online]. 2008. Výzkumná zpráva. MŠMT, [cit. 2014-07-31]. Dostupné z: http://ipn.msmt.cz/data/uploads/portal/Duvody_nezajmu_zaku_o_PTO.pdf.
  15. Eick, Ch. J. & Stewart, B. (2010). Dispositions Supporting Elementary Interns in the Teaching of Reform-Based Science Materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education. roč. 21, č. 7, s. 783 - 800. ISSN 1046-560X. Go to original source...
  16. European Commision. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. 59 s. Dostupné na: http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/school/doc/teachercomp_en.pdf.
  17. Fazio, X., Melville, W., Bartley, A. & Jones, D. (2008). Experience and Reflection: Preservice Science Teachers' Capacity for Teaching Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education. roč. 19, č. 5, s. 477 - 494.
  18. Forbes, C. T. & Davis, E.A. (2010). Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers' mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. vol. 47, č. 7, s. 820 - 839. Go to original source...
  19. Glen, N. J. & Dotger, S. (2009). Elementary teachers' use of language to label and interpret science concepts. Journal of Elementary Science Education. roč. 21. č. 4, s. 71 - 83. Go to original source...
  20. Glynn, S. M. & Winter, L.K. (2004). Contextual Teaching and Learning of science in elementary schools. Journal of Elementary Science Education. roč. 16, č. 2. s. 51 - 63. Go to original source...
  21. Gonzales Thompson, A. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics. roč. 15, č. 2, s. 105 - 127. Go to original source...
  22. Grimmet, P. P. & Erickson, G.L. (1988). Reflection in teacher education. New York: Teacher College Press.
  23. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.
  24. Hustler, D. & McIntyre, D.G. (1996). Developing competent teachers. London: David Fulton Publishers.
  25. Chambers, C. (2002). Multi-Curricular Inquiry-Based Learning. City College of the City University of New York: condor.admin.ccny.cuny.edu/.../carlchambers.researchpaper.doc
  26. Chráska, M. (2007). Metody pedagogického výzkumu: základy kvantitativního výzkumu. Praha: Grada Publishing.
  27. Improving Teacher Quality in the United States: Paper 3 [online]. [cit. 2014-10-05]. Harvard Graduate School of Education. Dostupné z: http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1203150.files/Panel%203%20%20Activating%20the%20Greatest%20Power/Lin_Li_50865444_US_TeacherQuality_submitted.pdf
  28. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: a guide for teaching and learning. (2000). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, xviii.
  29. Janík, T., Maňák, J., Knecht, P. & Němec, J., (2010). Proměny kurikula současné české školy: vize a realita. Orbis scholae. roč. 4, č. 3, s. 9 - 35.
  30. Jung, E. (2005). Aspekte des Kompetenzerwerbs, Unterricht - Arbeit +Technik, roč. 32, č. 8, s. 53-55.
  31. Katz, L., Sadler, K. & Craig, D.V. (2005). Science professors serve as mentors for early childhood preservice teachers in the design and implementation of standards-based science units. Journal of Elementary Science Education. roč. 17, č. 2, s. 43-55. Go to original source...
  32. Kim, M. & Tan, A. (2011). Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry-based practical work: stories from elementary pre-service teachers. International Journal of Science Education. roč. 33, s. 465 - 486. Go to original source...
  33. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist. roč. 41, č. 2, s. 75 - 86. Go to original source...
  34. Kleve, B. (2007). A study of teachers' views on the teaching and learning of mathematics, their intentions and their instructional practice. In: Relating Practice and Research in Mathematics Education. Proceedings of NORMA 05, Fourth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education. Editor Christer Bergsten, Barbro Greveholm, Heidi S. Måsøval, Frode Rønning. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press, s. 361 - 373.
  35. Klieme, E., Maag-Merki, K. & Hartig, J. (2010). Kompetence a jejich význam ve vzdělávání. Pedagogická orientace, roč. 20, č. 1, 104 - 119.
  36. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of good teacher: toward a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education. roč. 20, č. 1, s. 77 - 97. Go to original source...
  37. Lazarová, B. (Ed.). (2006). Cesty dalšího vzdělávání učitelů. Brno: Paido.
  38. Lee, O., Hart J.E., Cuevas, P. a Enders, C. (2004). Professional development in inquiry-based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. roč. 41, č. 10. s. 1021 - 1043. Go to original source...
  39. Leonard, J., Boakes, N & Moore, C.M., (2009). Conducting science inquiry in primary classrooms: Case studies of two preservice teachers' inquiry-based practices. Journal of Elementary Science Education. roč. 21, č. 1, s. 27 - 50. Go to original source...
  40. Maaß, K. & Euler, M. PRIMAS WP9 - Report about the survey on inquiry-based learning and teaching in the European partner countries, 2011. EU-Project PRIMAS, Deliverable N° 9.2.
  41. Magnusson, S., Kajcik, J. & Borko, H. (2002). Nature, Sources, and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching. In: Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Go to original source...
  42. Marble, S. (2007). Inquiring into Teaching: Lesson Study in Elementary Science Methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education. roč. 18. č. 6. s. 935 - 953.
  43. Martinello, M. L., (1998). Learning to Question for Inquiry. Educational Forum. roč. 62, č. 2, s. 164 - 171. Go to original source...
  44. McDonald, S. & Butler Songer, N. (2008). Enacting classroom inquiry: Theorizing teachers' conceptions of science teaching. Science Education. roč. 92. č. 6. s. 973 - 993.
  45. Nezvalová, D. (2007). Pedagogické kompetence. In: Kompetence a standardy v počáteční přípravě učitelů přírodovědných předmětů a matematiky. Editor Martin Bílek. Olomouc: UP, s. 7 - 20.
  46. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Evolution of Student Interest in Science and Technology Studies: Policy Report [online]. [cit. 2014-08-03]. Dostupné z: http://www.oecd.org/science/sci-tech/36645825.pdf
  47. Paaso, A. & Korento, K.. (2010). The Competent Teacher 2010-2020: The competences of teaching staff in upper secondary vocational education and training [online]. [cit. 2014-10-11]. Dostupné z: http://www.oph.fi/download/122136_The_competent_teacher_2010-2020.pdf
  48. Palmer, P. J., (1998). The Courage to Teach: Exploring the landscape of a teachers' life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Pelikán, J. (2004). Základy empirického výzkumu pedagogických jevů. Praha: Karolinum.
  49. Píšová, M. (2010). Učitel-expert: přehled výzkumných trendů a jejich výsledků. Pedagogika. roč. 60, č. 3-4, s. 242 - 253.
  50. Pollard, A. & Tann, S. (1987). Reflective Teaching in the Primary school. London: Cassel.
  51. Prawat, R.S. (1977). Problematizing Dewey's Views on Problem Solving: A Reply to Hiebert et al. Educational Researcher. roč. 26, č. 2, s. 19 - 21.
  52. Průcha, J. (2002). Moderní pedagogika. Praha: Portál.
  53. Průcha, J. (2009). Přehled pedagogiky. Praha: Portál.
  54. Rikmanis, I., Logins, J. a Namsone, D. (2012). Teacher Views on Inquiry-based Science Education. In: 1ST INTERNATIONAL PROFILES CONFERENCE, 24th - 26th September 2012 a C BOLTE. Inquiry-based science education in Europe: reflections from the PROFILES project : book of invited presenters. Berlin: Freie Universität, s. 14 - 16. ISBN 9783000394034.
  55. Science Education in Europe: National Practices, Policies and Research, 2011. Brussels: European Commission.
  56. Sikko, A. S., Lyngved, R. & Pepin, B. (2012). Working with Mathematics and Science teachers on inquiry-based learning (IBL) approaches: Teacher beliefs. Acta Didactica Norge. r. 6, č. 1, čl. 17.
  57. Spilková, V. & Wildová, R., (2014). Potřebujeme kvalitní nebo kvalifikované učitele? Pedagogická orientace. roč. 24, č. 3, s. 423-432. Go to original source...
  58. Spilková, V. (2010). Evropské přístupy k pojetí kvality učitele - optikou formálních dokumentů. Pedagogika. roč. 60, č. 3-4, s. 70 - 80.
  59. Steinberg, R.J. & Hotvath, J.A., (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher. roč. 24, č. 6, s. 9 - 17. Go to original source...
  60. Špok, D. (2014). Povolání, zaměstnání, pracovní pozice nebo profese? Dostupné na: http://www.etlabora.cz/povolani-zamestnani-pracovni-pozice-profese/
  61. Švaříček, R. (2006). Životní historie učitele experta. In Současné metodologické přístupy a strategie pedagogického výzkumu. Sborník příspěvků 14. konference ČAPV (CD - ROM). Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita v Plzni, s. 1 - 17.
  62. Švec, Vlastimil, (1999). Pedagogická příprava budoucích učitelů: problémy a inspirace. Brno: Paido.
  63. Talis 2013 Results: An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning, 2014. OECD.
  64. Tobon, S. (2009). Formación Basada en Competencias [online]. [cit. 2012-12-29]. Dostupné z: http://www.slideshare.net/MAESTRIACID/formacion-basada-en-competencias-pdf
  65. Tomková, A. (2005). Rozvoj klíčových kompetencí a pojetí výuky. Kritické listy. č. 20, s. 5 - 8.
  66. Vališová, A., Kasíková, H. (2007). Pedagogika pro učitele. Praha: Grada.
  67. Van Zee, E., H., Hammer, D., Bell, M., Roy, P. & Peter, J. (2005). Learning and teaching science as inquiry: A case study of elementary school teachers' investigations of light. Science Education. roč. 89., č. 6, s. 1007-1042. Go to original source...
  68. Vašutová, J. (2007). Být učitelem: co by měl učitel vědět o své profesi. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze.
  69. Vermeersch, J. (2005). Začněme s ODL. Apeldoorn: Garant.
  70. Walterová, E. (2002). Proměny školního kurikula, jeho tvorba a projektování. In: Konferencia o školskom kurikule: Budmerice 18.-19. novembra 2002. Editor Ľudovít Hrdina. Bratislava: Metodicko-pedagogické centrum, s. 5 - 21.
  71. Weinert, F. E., (2001). Concept of Competence: a Conceptual Clarification. In: Defining and Selecting Key Competencies. Editor Dominique Rychen, Laura Salganic. Göttingen: H and H Publishers, s. 45 - 65.
  72. Weld, J. & Funk, L., (2005). "I'm Not the Science Type": Effect of an Inquiry Biology Content Course on Preservice Elementary Teachers' Intentions About Teaching Science. Journal of Science Teacher Education. roč. 16, č. 3, s. 189 - 204. Go to original source...