JTIE 2016, 8(2):151-160 | 10.5507/jtie.2016.021

EVALUATION METHODS OF PHYSICAL PRODUCTS OF PUPILS IN TERMS OF CREATIVITY AND OTHER SELECTED PARAMETERS

Jan KROTKÝ, Petr SIMBARTL
Západočeská univerzita v Plzni, Česká republika

The authors of the article deal with the question of evaluating physical products from several viewpoints and they search for a possibility how to implement the evaluation of creativity. A change like this assumes a modern and innovative approach to education. Information was gained from the research activity, which included mainly foreign sources in the form of published research results and conclusions of educational organizations. The presented results will be used for further research on new evaluation methods corresponding to the current trends in the field of technical education at primary schools. These methods may be subsequently tested in practice.

Keywords: creativity, innovation, World of Work, Man and the World of Work primary schools, technical education

Received: April 30, 2016; Accepted: July 5, 2016; Prepublished online: July 8, 2016; Published: October 27, 2016

Download citation

References

  1. Adams, J. L. (2001). Conceptual blockbusting. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.
  2. Alimardani, K., & Soheili, J. (2014). On the effect of physical attributes of classroom environment on the creativity of educable mentally retarded students. In: International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning, Vol. 24, No. 1.
  3. Amabile, T. (1998). How to Kill Creativity. Harvard Business Review, September-October Issue. Dostupné z: https://hbr.org/1998/09/how-to-kill-creativity
  4. Amabile, T., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer S. J. (2002). "Creativity Under the Gun." In: Special Issue on The Innovative Enterprise: Turning Ideas into Profits Harvard Business Review 80, 8, 52-61.
  5. Brady, R., & Auslen L. (2012). Study Reveals Global Creativity Gap. Adobe Systems Incorporated. San Jose. Dostupné z: Study Reveals Global Creativity Gap
  6. Callahan, C. M., Tomlinson, C. A., Hunsaker, S. L., Bland, L. C., & Moon, T. R. (1995). Instruments and evaluation designs used in gifted programs (Research Monograph 95132). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  7. Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In: J. C. Kaufman and J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the mus. 169-185.
  8. Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C. & Cropley, A. J. (2011). Measuring Creativity for Innovation Management. doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242011000300002. Go to original source...
  9. Draxal, L. (2016). Praktická část diplomové práce Rozvoj technických kompetencí žáka. In Olympiáda techniky Plzeň 2016 : sborník příspěvků z mezinárodní studentské odborné konference. Plzeň, Západočeská univerzita
  10. Draxal, L. (2016a). Rozvoj technických kompetencí žáka. Diplomová práce. Plzeň, Západočeská univerzita v Plzni
  11. Honzíková, J. (2015). Creativity and Skills in School Environment. Saabrucken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
  12. Industry 4.0. (2015). Evaluation methods of physical products of pupils in terms of creativity and other selected parameters. Zurich: The Creative Studio at Deloitte. Dostupné z: http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ch/Documents/manufacturing/ch-en-manufacturing-industry-4-0-24102014.pdf
  13. Krotký, J. (2015). Nové formy tvorby multimediálních učebnic. Plzeň. Disertační práce. Západočeská univerzita, Fakulta pedagogická.
  14. Laznibatová, J. (2007). Nadané dieťa jeho vývin, vzdelávanie a podporovanie. Bratislava, IRIS
  15. Mach, P., Simbartl, P. & Krotký, J. (2015). World of Work - Aktivita 1 Průzkum - Vyhodnocení dotazníkového šetření. ZČU v Plzni. Dostupné z: http://www.world-of-work.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Research_report_CZ.pdf
  16. Makhmalbaf, A., & Yi-luen Do, E. (2007). Physical environment and creativity: comparing children's drawing behavior at home and at the bookstore. In: IASDR07, College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology. Dostupné z: https://wiki.cc.gatech.edu/designcomp/images/9/95/IASDR-phys-env-creative.pdf
  17. Maňák, J. (2001). Stručný nástin metodiky tvořivé práce ve škole. Brno, Paido
  18. Manifesto 15. (2015). Evoluce vzdělávání. Česká škola. Dostupné z: http://www.ceskaskola.cz/2015/03/manifesto-15-evoluce-vzdelavani.html
  19. Mastracci at al. (2012). Échange de pratiques portant sur l'évaluation des apprentissages de la créativité en conception graphique. Montréal: Cégep Marie-Victorin, CCNB - Campus de Dieppe.
  20. Naiman, L. (2012). The Global Creativity Gap. Creativity at Work. Dostupné z: http://www.creativityatwork.com/2012/04/23/the-global-creativity-gap/
  21. Naiman, L. (2014). What is Creativity?. Creativity at Work. Dostupné z: http://www.creativityatwork.com/2014/02/17/what-is-creativity/
  22. Pecina, P. (2007). Tvořivost ve vzdělávání žáků. Brno, Masarykova univerzita
  23. Reis, S. M., & Renzuli, J. S. (2004). The Assessment of Creative Product in Programs for Gifted and Talented Students. In: Carolin M. Callahan, Program Evaluation in gifted education, Corwin press, A sage Publication Comp. Thousand Oaks, California, USA. Go to original source...
  24. Rhodes, M. (1961). An Analysis of Creativity. In: The Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 7, 305-310.
  25. Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review. In: Creativity Research Journal, 16, 4, 361-388. Dostupné z: http://www.gettingsorted.com/Scott__et_al__2004_Creativity_Training.pdf Go to original source...
  26. Šťáva, J. (1997). Lze tvořivost naučit? In Tvořivost učitele k tvořivosti žáků: sborník z celostátního semináře k problematice tvořivosti v práci učitele a žáka. Brno, Paido
  27. Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson C. (2002). Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators. The national research center on the gifted and talented. Dostupné z: http://nrcgt.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/953/2015/04/rm02170.pdf