JTIE 2012, 4(1):50-55 | 10.5507/jtie.2012.009


Katedra fyziky, Pedagogická fakulta Trnavskej univerzity, Priemyselná 4 , 918 43 Trnava, SR

Slovak students have problems to apply theory in practice. To change this situation we have to change the ways of the transfer of knowledge. Activating methods appear to be a good choice. In the paper, a concrete example of the implementation of the activating methods via three remote experiments (online meteorological stations) (http://remotelab1.truni.sk, http://experimenta.fe.up.pt/estacaometeorologica/index.php?lang=pt, http://kdt-16.karlov.mff.cuni.cz/en/mereni.html) and project method is described. Furthermore, a pedagogical research on a sample of 156 primary school students is analyzed. It is a continuation of the previous pilot research and it's still going on. The results of the first didactic tests and a questionnaire are presented and discussed. It turns out that students actively involved in the work with the remote experiments get a higher score on tasks of a practical work with data.

Keywords: real remote experiments, research, project method, didactic test, questionnaire

Published: April 1, 2012

Download citation


  1. COOPER, M. 2005. Remote laboratories in teaching and learning - issues impinging on widespread adoption in science and engineering education. In. International Journal of Online Engineering (iJOE). Vol. 1, No. 1, ISSN: 18612121.
  2. KORŠŇÁKOVÁ, P., KOVÁČOVÁ, J., HELDOVÁ, D. 2010. Národná správa OECD PISA Slovensko 2009. Bratislava: Národný ústav certifikovaných meraní vzdelávania. 60 p. ISBN 978-80-970261-4-1.
  3. NICKERSON, J., CORTER, J, ESCHE S., AND CHASSAPIS, C. 2007. A model for evaluating the effectiveness of remote engineering laboratories and simulations in ducation. UK: Elsevier Science Ltd., 2007, pp. 708-725, ISSN 0360-1315. Go to original source...
  4. OŽVOLDOVÁ, M. 2010. Je výučba prírodných vied v kríze? Ako ďalej? In Acta Fac. Paed. Univ. Tyrnaviensis, Ser. C. Trnava: University of Trnava, 2010, pp. 49-68, ISBN 978-80-8082-432-7.
  5. OŽVOLDOVÁ, M. et al. 2011. 1st Slovak natural sciences e-laboratory. In. Obzory matematiky, fyziky a informatiky. Vol. 40, No. 2. ISSN 1335-4981, pp. 31-37.
  6. OŽVOLDOVÁ, M., ŽOVÍNOVÁ, M. 2011. Integrated e-Learning Demonstrated with Free Fall e-Experiment. In. E-learning, Distance Education... or the Education of 21st Century. Sofia, Bulgaria : Izdatelstvo Demetra EOOD. ISBN 978-954-9526-75-2, pp. 154-161.
  7. THORNTON R. K., SOKOLOFF D. R. 1998 Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. In. Amer. J. of Physics, Vol. 66, No. 4. ISSN 0002-9505, pp. 338-352. Go to original source...
  8. WIEMAN, C., PERKINS, K. 2005. Transforming physics education. In: Physics Today, vol. 58, 2005, pp. 36-41, ISSN 00319228. Go to original source...
  9. WOSILAIT, K., HERON, P. R. L., SHAFFER, P. S. AND MCDERMOTT, L. C. 1998. Development and assessment of a researchbased tutorial on light and shadow. In. Am. J. Phys., Vol. 66, No. 10. ISSN 0002-9505, pp. 906-913. Go to original source...
  10. YEŞILYURT, M. 2002. Student teachers' attitudes about basic physics laboratory. In: TOJET, vol. 3, 2002, pp. 49-57, ISSN 1303 - 6521.
  11. ZÁHOREC, J. HAŠKOVÁ, A. 2009. Empirical research of influencing students' attitudes towards teaching subjects by multimedia teaching materials. In: JTIE. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého, 2009, pp. 69 - 76, ISSN 1803-6805. Go to original source...
  12. ŽOVÍNOVÁ, M., OŽVOLDOVÁ, M. 2011. Remote experimentation at primary school. In HSCI 2011: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Hands-on Science Focus on Multimedia, September 15 to 17, 2011, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Slovenia: University of Ljubljana. ISBN 978-989-95095-73, pp. 110-114.